2012年09月27日
SOCIAL NETWORKING - Frugal Traveler Blog - NYTimes
Waisum Tam has a invisible Though she may look petite, and may glide unnoticed among the many bearded and fashionable patrons of , a present cocktail-and-hamburger joint in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Cobble Hill,http://61.132.31.58:99/xx/blog/user1/a6c211560/archives/2012/21234.html,プラダサングラス, Ms. Tam,http://cms.jk-sun.com/viewthread.php?tid=2533263&extra=, a 34-year-old marketing consultant,アシックス GEL Stratus 2.1, has outsize status there. She namely the .
Her office which namely largely ceremonial,MBT 通販,namely never completely hidden however Any users of , a year-old social networking platform,ルブタン ウェッジ,ascertain Ms. Tam’s identity as soon as they arrive by the restaurant and click “Check In” aboard their iPhone alternatively other smartphones). But Ms. Tam’s mayoralty namely a brittle thing she won it simply according retarding amid by Henry Public more frequently than anyone else, and anybody of those other Foursquare users could usurp her merely along perform the same. In the world of Foursquare, incumbency carries micro weight.
Now, Foursquare may sound prefer equitable another frivolous,プラダ 財布, high-tech waste of phase the kind of fad journalists and their editors adore to tout as the then colossal step ahead surrounded our collective digital evolution. And,constantly it is sort of silly: As you detain among at more and more establishments bars and restaurants,http://cyworld.ifensi.com/ps2/diary/diary_view.php?mh_id=2014306844&diary_date=20120927&postid=796048, bookstores and museums you win virtual value badges that brand you as one ever more seasoned Foursquarer. But Foursquare, along with several other commonly free) social-networking apps, has the latent to chanced a priceless tool as passengers seeking deals, discounts and frugal-minded tips.
Her office which namely largely ceremonial,MBT 通販,namely never completely hidden however Any users of , a year-old social networking platform,ルブタン ウェッジ,ascertain Ms. Tam’s identity as soon as they arrive by the restaurant and click “Check In” aboard their iPhone alternatively other smartphones). But Ms. Tam’s mayoralty namely a brittle thing she won it simply according retarding amid by Henry Public more frequently than anyone else, and anybody of those other Foursquare users could usurp her merely along perform the same. In the world of Foursquare, incumbency carries micro weight.
Now, Foursquare may sound prefer equitable another frivolous,プラダ 財布, high-tech waste of phase the kind of fad journalists and their editors adore to tout as the then colossal step ahead surrounded our collective digital evolution. And,constantly it is sort of silly: As you detain among at more and more establishments bars and restaurants,http://cyworld.ifensi.com/ps2/diary/diary_view.php?mh_id=2014306844&diary_date=20120927&postid=796048, bookstores and museums you win virtual value badges that brand you as one ever more seasoned Foursquarer. But Foursquare, along with several other commonly free) social-networking apps, has the latent to chanced a priceless tool as passengers seeking deals, discounts and frugal-minded tips.
2012年09月27日
They Didn't Win, but They Deserve Some Applause -
More than the physical and cerebral combats that playing an elite-level match necessitate, the true brutality of a tennis tournament is the near-inevitability of leaving as a loser. One hundred and twenty eight men entered the singles competition by the 2011 United States Open, and more or less oneNovak Djokovicleave New York as a loser.
But there are certainly those among the also-rans who value appreciation. A penetrate by seven deserving men,an as every circular of the tournament.
Most impressive first-round loser (men): Andrey Golubev I watched Golubev activity Stanislas Wawrinka two weeks along the U.S. Open aboard a small external tribunal among suburban Cincinnati, a match that was famous only for Golubev entered it with a near-record 18-match losing streak by the A.T.P.class A spectator approach me asked why I was covering Golubev, of always players, and I told him virtually the streak.
“Wow,” the spectator said. “If that was me I would work home and shoot myself.”
Despite the cheap stamina of the crowd Golubev managed to break the streak that daytime coming after to knocked the seeded Wawrinka surrounded three sets and looking nothing favor a player who had not won surrounded about six months. Golubev looked identical incapable of such prolonged losing among his first circuitous U.S. Open match,コーチ ポーチ,merely he had the misfortune of playing safeguarding champion Rafael Nadal. Golubev played fearlessly antagonism the enormous odds,http://cyworld.ifensi.com/ps2/diary/diary_view.php?mh_id=2014396036&diary_date=20120927&postid=767689, breaking Nadal’s serve six times and holding several set points ahead eventually falling surrounded direct sets. Honorable mention: Steve Johnson
Most impressive second round loser (men): Gael Monfils Monfils, the seventh seed who lost in the second circular to become the highest-ranked first-week casualty aboard the men’s side, didn’t impress with his outcome But his always-spectacular activity was particularly scintillating by this tournament, producing jaw-dropping substance surrounded both a straight-set win over Grigor Dimitrov and a five-set loss to 2003 finalist Juan Carlos Ferrero. Monfils regularly elected entertainment over efficiency, taking the scenic path amongst points to the delight of the audience It’s a tendency that may reserve him from winning a Slam,barely won’t reserve him off any highlight reel any time soon. For a favorite who lost an early heartbreaker, Monfils was especially gracious surrounded defeat, and revealed shortly later that he had played the tournament amongst a knee injury that longing reserve him out of the Davis Cup semifinals this weekend. Honorable mention: Jack Sock
Most impressive third-round loser (men): Tommy Haas As a player who once reached as lofty as No.two among the A.T.P. rankings, it’s equitable to wonder why the injury-plagued, 33-year-old Haas keeps struggling to come after Haas entered the 2011 U.S. Open with a ranking of No. 475, a position he was capable to amend nearly 200 specks (to No. 291) with a escape to the third circuitous Unlike Monfils, there namely never a sense that Haas wants to do anything only win meanwhile aboard the court an attitude that allows him to dominate even as his body breaks down. His period to use a defended ranking is running out, and it remains to be seen how willing he longing be to drudgery through the challenger circuit to dig his access behind If this was his final Grand Slam,asics shoes australia, it was an impressive one Honorable mention: Marin Cilic
Most impressive fourth-round loser (men): Donald Young Considering forever the winning he did at the junior class it shouldn’t be prodigious that Young made it into the second week of a Slam by 22. But the slow, controversial road he has taken to the top 50 (a threshold he broke as the 1st phase with his escape among New York) quit his success looking anything only inevitable. Victory has a access of mending bridges, as was shown forward the U.S.T.A.’s embrace of Young after his upset wins over No. 14 Stanislas Wawrinka among a grueling five-setter) and No. 24 Juan Ignacio Chela. Young didn’t gleam much among his fourth-round detriment to Andy Murray,オニツカタイガー,only the tournament’s most successful wild card has yet proven profusion Honorable mention: Alexandr Dolgopolov
Most impressive quarterfinal loser (men): John Isner When citing what a difficult epoch it has been for players to crash amongst to win a Grand Slam (26 of the last 27 having been won onward only Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, and Djokovic), the players most constantly mentioned as sufferers of this oligarchy are the ones impartial under it,favor Andy Murray, Andy Roddick, and Robin Soderling. But the effects approach distant deeper than that. In any other epoch,Isner probably would win a Grand Slam,alternatively at least acquaint a final or two,among the way colossal servers Goran Ivanisevic, Richard Krajicek, and Todd Martin were able to do. This was never more apparent than along this tournament,surrounded which Isner reached his 1st Grand Slam quarterfinal, and shoved Murray to the brink of a fifth set. Isner may still have a draw break his way among the hereafter only at the very least this tournament ought build him firmly surrounded the penultimate tier of tennis. Honorable mention: Andy Roddick
Most impressive semifinal loser (men): Roger Federer The only man to have won a match point against Djokovic all daily Federer was aboard the fringe of perform so afresh in his U.S. Open semifinal,forward the Serb played brazenly slack tennis to stave off either of Federer’s chances and reverse the course of the fifth set. Federer was understandably devastated after the match,either to lose subsequently being a point away from victory and to annihilate a year without a Slam caption to his name for the 1st period since 2002. But afterward early losses at Wimbledon,アバクロンビーフィッチ銀座, Toronto,asics shoes, and Cincinnati, this flee should reaffirm Federer’s presence as a player still capable of beating forever others, and winning any tournament. Honorable mention: Andy Murray
Most impressive runner-up (men): Rafael Nadal After his aforementioned first-round skirmish against Golubev, Rafael Nadal did not look long as the 2011 U.S. Open. But trailing Gilles Muller amid the fourth circular Nadal’s play seemed to have been given current stamina forward the rain and the frustration it reasoned him. From the second set of his match against Muller through his quarterfinal win over Roddick, Nadal lost only nine games, an absurdly small number for the second week of a Slam. Nadal’s form was equally strong against Murray and Djokovic,merely Nadal’s inability to finish points immediately makes him unlikely to hammered Djokovic when the Serb plays the sort of superior tennis he has this annual.
But there are certainly those among the also-rans who value appreciation. A penetrate by seven deserving men,an as every circular of the tournament.
Most impressive first-round loser (men): Andrey Golubev I watched Golubev activity Stanislas Wawrinka two weeks along the U.S. Open aboard a small external tribunal among suburban Cincinnati, a match that was famous only for Golubev entered it with a near-record 18-match losing streak by the A.T.P.class A spectator approach me asked why I was covering Golubev, of always players, and I told him virtually the streak.
“Wow,” the spectator said. “If that was me I would work home and shoot myself.”
Despite the cheap stamina of the crowd Golubev managed to break the streak that daytime coming after to knocked the seeded Wawrinka surrounded three sets and looking nothing favor a player who had not won surrounded about six months. Golubev looked identical incapable of such prolonged losing among his first circuitous U.S. Open match,コーチ ポーチ,merely he had the misfortune of playing safeguarding champion Rafael Nadal. Golubev played fearlessly antagonism the enormous odds,http://cyworld.ifensi.com/ps2/diary/diary_view.php?mh_id=2014396036&diary_date=20120927&postid=767689, breaking Nadal’s serve six times and holding several set points ahead eventually falling surrounded direct sets. Honorable mention: Steve Johnson
Most impressive second round loser (men): Gael Monfils Monfils, the seventh seed who lost in the second circular to become the highest-ranked first-week casualty aboard the men’s side, didn’t impress with his outcome But his always-spectacular activity was particularly scintillating by this tournament, producing jaw-dropping substance surrounded both a straight-set win over Grigor Dimitrov and a five-set loss to 2003 finalist Juan Carlos Ferrero. Monfils regularly elected entertainment over efficiency, taking the scenic path amongst points to the delight of the audience It’s a tendency that may reserve him from winning a Slam,barely won’t reserve him off any highlight reel any time soon. For a favorite who lost an early heartbreaker, Monfils was especially gracious surrounded defeat, and revealed shortly later that he had played the tournament amongst a knee injury that longing reserve him out of the Davis Cup semifinals this weekend. Honorable mention: Jack Sock
Most impressive third-round loser (men): Tommy Haas As a player who once reached as lofty as No.two among the A.T.P. rankings, it’s equitable to wonder why the injury-plagued, 33-year-old Haas keeps struggling to come after Haas entered the 2011 U.S. Open with a ranking of No. 475, a position he was capable to amend nearly 200 specks (to No. 291) with a escape to the third circuitous Unlike Monfils, there namely never a sense that Haas wants to do anything only win meanwhile aboard the court an attitude that allows him to dominate even as his body breaks down. His period to use a defended ranking is running out, and it remains to be seen how willing he longing be to drudgery through the challenger circuit to dig his access behind If this was his final Grand Slam,asics shoes australia, it was an impressive one Honorable mention: Marin Cilic
Most impressive fourth-round loser (men): Donald Young Considering forever the winning he did at the junior class it shouldn’t be prodigious that Young made it into the second week of a Slam by 22. But the slow, controversial road he has taken to the top 50 (a threshold he broke as the 1st phase with his escape among New York) quit his success looking anything only inevitable. Victory has a access of mending bridges, as was shown forward the U.S.T.A.’s embrace of Young after his upset wins over No. 14 Stanislas Wawrinka among a grueling five-setter) and No. 24 Juan Ignacio Chela. Young didn’t gleam much among his fourth-round detriment to Andy Murray,オニツカタイガー,only the tournament’s most successful wild card has yet proven profusion Honorable mention: Alexandr Dolgopolov
Most impressive quarterfinal loser (men): John Isner When citing what a difficult epoch it has been for players to crash amongst to win a Grand Slam (26 of the last 27 having been won onward only Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, and Djokovic), the players most constantly mentioned as sufferers of this oligarchy are the ones impartial under it,favor Andy Murray, Andy Roddick, and Robin Soderling. But the effects approach distant deeper than that. In any other epoch,Isner probably would win a Grand Slam,alternatively at least acquaint a final or two,among the way colossal servers Goran Ivanisevic, Richard Krajicek, and Todd Martin were able to do. This was never more apparent than along this tournament,surrounded which Isner reached his 1st Grand Slam quarterfinal, and shoved Murray to the brink of a fifth set. Isner may still have a draw break his way among the hereafter only at the very least this tournament ought build him firmly surrounded the penultimate tier of tennis. Honorable mention: Andy Roddick
Most impressive semifinal loser (men): Roger Federer The only man to have won a match point against Djokovic all daily Federer was aboard the fringe of perform so afresh in his U.S. Open semifinal,forward the Serb played brazenly slack tennis to stave off either of Federer’s chances and reverse the course of the fifth set. Federer was understandably devastated after the match,either to lose subsequently being a point away from victory and to annihilate a year without a Slam caption to his name for the 1st period since 2002. But afterward early losses at Wimbledon,アバクロンビーフィッチ銀座, Toronto,asics shoes, and Cincinnati, this flee should reaffirm Federer’s presence as a player still capable of beating forever others, and winning any tournament. Honorable mention: Andy Murray
Most impressive runner-up (men): Rafael Nadal After his aforementioned first-round skirmish against Golubev, Rafael Nadal did not look long as the 2011 U.S. Open. But trailing Gilles Muller amid the fourth circular Nadal’s play seemed to have been given current stamina forward the rain and the frustration it reasoned him. From the second set of his match against Muller through his quarterfinal win over Roddick, Nadal lost only nine games, an absurdly small number for the second week of a Slam. Nadal’s form was equally strong against Murray and Djokovic,merely Nadal’s inability to finish points immediately makes him unlikely to hammered Djokovic when the Serb plays the sort of superior tennis he has this annual.